Acanthophis Gore: Acanthophis Gore pt I

<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d25696304\x26blogName\x3dAcanthophis+Gore\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttp://acanthophisgore.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://acanthophisgore.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-815803345013171220', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

4/29/07

Acanthophis Gore pt I





On March 16th 2007 an interfaith group (misguided church-goers) who had scheduled a 9 day walk from Northampton to Boston to raise awareness on Global Warming (GW) set out on their trek. Someone asked Rev. Fred Small if he knew that US Airlines had grounded more than 2000 flights due to the record snow fall. He pointed out that the Airline's cancellation had stirred the political waters. People were now saying that it was shameful for Al Gore to be showing his movie on GW to children in Jr High and High school while thousands of people were stranded in New England due to record snow storms. like a true.....storm trooper Rev. Small said, ""I tell them: 'we walk.'"

So how did they fair? "It was windy and cold. I was walking on the front of the line and I felt like I was bow of a ship with the wind just coming into my face," said the Rev. Margaret Bullitt-Jonas.It was a sight, a group of totally sold out Global Warming nutburgers walking on snow covered sidewalks and through three feet of the fluffy white in some places. Proving our point in a most satiric fashion.

7 Comments:

Anonymous Dave said...

Ken, you dumb dumb.
What a cute little ditty you've done up here.
Duhuh gorsh, yer so clever.
What I don't understand about those who don't think that global warming is a threat to them or their children and grandchildren (i.e. pollution) is that they want to sacrifice the environment for the economic goods and comforts that come out of heavy industry and pollution.

"One essential piece of information is the comparative valuation attached to retaining industrial civilization versus avoiding global warming. If one values the benefits provided by industrial civilization above the avoidance of the losses alleged to result from global warming, it follows that nothing should be done to stop global warming that destroys or undermines industrial civilization. That is, it follows that global warming should simply be accepted as a byproduct of economic progress and that life should go on as normal in the face of it."

So despite this little article you have here, making fun of people who care (which I even find funny, but just short of ironic, because snowfall in certain parts of the world does not refute the science and facts of global warming) about the envronment...
hell, let's even say DESPITE GLOBAL WARMING ITSELF...we can pretend it doesn't exist for the sake of argument here,...
So your thought is that it's okay to pollute, because it gives us good shoes and hair products and even though we have resources for recycling we should avoid it because it's all just a leftist ploy to make us pay more even though recycled goods and conserving energy have been proven to be 55% more cost beneficial to the economy?

Basically, what I'm saying is, recycle, dumbass.
What good are all the profits in the world, if you can't enjoy the world in which your profits come from?

4/03/2007

5/14/2007  
Anonymous Dave said...

This link may help clear up some of your cluttered misunderstanding of the subject;

http://economistsview.typepad.com
/economistsview/2007/03/
why_republicans_1.html

5/14/2007  
Blogger The Squamata Report said...

I'm sorry to have to repost this sad paragraph from your comment but I must.
You said:
"So your thought is that it's okay to pollute, because it gives us good shoes and hair products and even though we have resources for recycling we should avoid it because it's all just a leftist ploy to make us pay more even though recycled goods and conserving energy have been proven to be 55% more cost beneficial to the economy?"

Hmmm, can't find my reference to recycling but thanks for bringing it up. It helps to illustrate just how effective the Leftist leaders on GW are in their propaganda.
No one says we should not recycle or take care of our planet. You obfuscate the real issue when you misinterpret the facts and lead the conversation into another direction.

Global Warming fanatics do not care if you recycle. They use the 'Greenies' to push their agenda but they could not care less about preserving the planet. Al Gore wants the power to ratify Kyoto. That's all he and the Socialist Left need to accomplish their 'Unified Earth' goal! They know that if they can force America to reduce it's military, over tax it's citizens, and attach the economic yoke of a collapsed industrial infrastructure (the real world result of Kyoto) they can reduce America's power and influence in the world and give rise to anarchy. Anarchy and holy wars will require a unified body of nations to come to the rescue. Enter the corrupt, evil, impotent, prostrate UN.
The Socialist Left have an ultimate goal, as ACLU founder Roger Baldwin stated bluntly, "Communism is the Goal."

David, if the wack jobs who are pushing this FARCE are successful, taxes will be attached to everything they deem contributes to ozone depletion. Your light bulbs will be first.
We will add hundreds of tons of mercury to our homes that is not there in an incandescent. Yet they will force everyone to have them. The bulbs are expensive so how do poor people afford them...... yep you guessed it, tax increases. Next will be your air conditioners, car, food, clothes and even your children. Brussels Belgium has approved a tax on Bar-B-Qing. They believe the evil BBQ emits Co2 and causes global warming. How will they monitor this? They will fly helicoptors over houses and issue tickets by mail!
So if you guys who want to win big with Global Warming actually achieve your goal and force these restrictions and taxes on everyone in the world, where will our freedom be? Where will our progress be? How will we evolve from our current generational milestone? The answer, we will not have any freedom nor any progress. Our species will discontinue evolution. And no I don't mean the from monkey to me evolution I mean from 3rd world status to Manhattanite evolution.

Yeah, laugh it up but when the new bio fuel becomes the old fossil fuel you'll understand. When your electricity usage is rationed and you spend half a day in utter cold or heat you'll see where I am coming from. When Kyoto forces us to reduce Co2 output by 80% within 10 years, you'll miss a few things....like that automobile you drive. Even if we began a mad rush to convert to another fuel we would still be two decades away from using it. Our economy would collapse. You may be ok with others imposing their will on you (for the good of the people) but it pisses me off! Kyoto calls for an eventual phase out of all cattle and medium to large livestock. That means no more hamburgers or steaks or pork or most other meats. Vast industries dying will create a super depression and abject poverty. Have you explored the path Kyoto and enviro-nazis are preparing for us? But I guess if you are like so many self-deprecating leftists you think a 3rd world castrated America is a good thing. America is evil because they are spread all over the world fighting for and securing freedom. If that is your take then we will never agree.

Stay tuned Dave, I'm not done yet. Acanthophis Gore is a new series I am running. They are to be examples that Gore's proclamation that the GW debate is over, is a sick lie!

4/03/2007

5/14/2007  
Anonymous Dave said...

K: I'm sorry to have to repost this sad paragraph from your comment but I must.
You said:
"So your thought is that it's okay to pollute, because it gives us good shoes and hair products and even though we have resources for recycling we should avoid it because it's all just a leftist ploy to make us pay more even though recycled goods and conserving energy have been proven to be 55% more cost beneficial to the economy?"

Hmmm, can't find my reference to recycling but thanks for bringing it up. It helps to illustrate just how effective the Leftist leaders on GW are in their propaganda.
No one says we should not recycle or take care of our planet. You obfuscate the real issue when you misinterpret the facts and lead the conversation into another direction.

Global Warming fanatics do not care if you recycle. They use the 'Greenies' to push their agenda but they could not care less about preserving the planet. Al Gore wants the power to ratify Kyoto. That's all he and the Socialist Left need to accomplish their 'Unified Earth' goal! They know that if they can force America to reduce it's military, over tax it's citizens, and attach the economic yoke of a collapsed industrial infrastructure (the real world result of Kyoto) they can reduce America's power and influence in the world and give rise to anarchy. Anarchy and holy wars will require a unified body of nations to come to the rescue. Enter the corrupt, evil, impotent, prostrate UN.
The Socialist Left have an ultimate goal, as ACLU founder Roger Baldwin stated bluntly, "Communism is the Goal."
D: Ken, the goal of the ACLU is to help other people. No law anywhere says you are required to let the ACLU help you. You can take it, or leave it. So leave the ACLU out of the environmental concerns we are discussing. Besides, I never mentioned the ACLU and you obfuscate the real issue when you misinterpret the facts and lead the conversation into another direction.


K: David, if the wack jobs who are pushing this FARCE are successful, taxes will be attached to everything they deem contributes to ozone depletion. Your light bulbs will be first.
D: Ken, if the taxes are imposed to help the environment, then that’s a price I’m willing to pay.

K: We will add hundreds of tons of mercury to our homes that is not there in an incandescent. Yet they will force everyone to have them. The bulbs are expensive so how do poor people afford them.
D: Ken, actually, they last longer and do not emit any mercury whatsoever. So if they last longer, one will ultimately spend LESS on their household efficiency items. We will be forced to save money? Whoa, sounds terrible.
K: ..... yep you guessed it, tax increases. Next will be your air conditioners, car, food, clothes and even your children.
D: My children?! How fascist! Do go on…
K: Brussels Belgium has approved a tax on Bar-B-Qing. They believe the evil BBQ emits Co2 and causes global warming.
D: Well, the “evil” BBQ as you’ve described it does emit Co2, but not a significant quantity to influence the Co2 content in the atmosphere compared to the United States. Maybe the Belgians think of BBQ as a luxury? And since when are you worried about any other country besides your own? LOL.
PS – please send me a link on this one. I tried looking for the article on Google. Couldn’t find anything.
And that’s another thing; don’t you know that America consumes and pollutes the most out of any other country? Maybe The United States should pony up a little more taxes to cover the damage already incurred by the rest of the world. (Don’t worry, China’s not far behind, so you will be able to blame them any day now.)
K: How will they monitor this?
D: Good question.

K: They will fly helicoptors over houses and issue tickets by mail!
D: Mmmm, I seriously doubt it, but I’ll keep my watchful eye to the sky. Next time you accuse me or anyone else of being a conspiracy theorist, I’m just going to laugh hysterically from now on.

K: So if you guys who want to win big with Global Warming
D: Wait a minute…’win big’? If we ignore the problem like we’ve been doing, nobody wins, my dear friend. Nobody is looking to “win big”. Oh, I think you’re talking about votes. It seems as though you’re projecting this ideal on me and others that care for their environment and don’t want to get the point in our Earth’s great future where we have to live in “green zones”.
K: actually achieve your goal and force these restrictions and taxes on everyone in the world, where will our freedom be?
D: Well, for starters how about less cancer, less pollutant caused diseases, less respiratory problems, being able to breath freely and exercise outdoors, drink clean water, and utilize clean transportation with out emitting mega tons of crap into the environment, do away with oil spills and killing tons of sea life (of which I love to eat for dinner) and um…well, if you can think of any more, don’t hesitate to add on here.
K: Where will our progress be? How will we evolve from our current generational milestone? The answer, we will not have any freedom nor any progress. Our species will discontinue evolution. And no I don't mean the from monkey to me evolution I mean from 3rd world status to Manhattanite evolution.
D: So you’re saying we’ll be in a progressive gridlock? Oh no! That sounds like…oh, wait, that’s right now. EEEEEEAAAAHHH!!! Wrong! Try again.
I can’t believe you actually think that following Kyoto protocols would be anti-progressive. It’s like, what ever you say, the opposite is true.

K:Yeah, laugh it up but when the new bio fuel becomes the old fossil fuel you'll understand.
D: I’m not trying to be condescending here, but I don’t think bio fuels are the way to go.
I’m an advocate of electric (which I suppose comes from coal, but there other ways to harness electric energy such as wind and sun which can be successfully stored for later usage) energy and hydrogen which can both be produced in the future with no emissions or pollution what so ever. And as the technology gets better, the price will continue to decline. Just like DVD players.
K: When your electricity usage is rationed and you spend half a day in utter cold or heat you'll see where I am coming from.
D: Ah ha, that’s the anarchy you were referring to, because knowing you and I both, we, as a people and citizens of this country (world) simply, wouldn’t stand for it. And I think we both can rationalize how that’s highly unlikely. Are you trying to just scare people? Sounds familiar. Are the terrorists going to take our electricity?
K:When Kyoto forces us to reduce Co2 output by 80% within 10 years, you'll miss a few things....like that automobile you drive. Even if we began a mad rush to convert to another fuel we would still be two decades away from using it. Our economy would collapse. You may be ok with others imposing their will on you (for the good of the people) but it pisses me off!
D: The initiative of Kyoto does not advocate economic collapse. It would actually help in terms of economic and distribution sanctions with our GDP and world resourced (alternative) energies. Our economy would be fine, if not better.
K: Kyoto calls for an eventual phase out of all cattle and medium to large livestock.
D: No, it doesn’t. It calls for tighter guidelines on farming regulations and tougher restrictions on pollutants that are incurred from the waste products from cattle and livestock. These have nothing to do with us getting our filet’s or ribeyes (medium for me, please). Besides, with our high blood pressure and cholesterol, we should be eating Bison (large livestock) or fish. More specifically, salmon.
K: That means no more hamburgers or steaks or pork or most other meats. Vast industries dying will create a super depression and abject poverty. Have you explored the path Kyoto and enviro-nazis are preparing for us?
D: No, but “envro-nazis” seem a lot more sane right now compared to “net profit corporate nazis”.
But I guess if you are like so many self-deprecating leftists you think a 3rd world castrated America is a good thing. America is evil because they are spread all over the world fighting for and securing freedom. If that is your take then we will never agree.
D: Grrr, tiger, slow down there. The reason I comment on all these political blogs about the future of our great nation in the first place is because I do care about America because I love America. I just hate the assholes in upper management and corporate boardrooms deciding our fate, rather than us.

K: Stay tuned Dave, I'm not done yet. Acanthophis Gore is a new series I am running. They are to be examples that Gore's proclamation that the GW debate is over, is a sick lie!
D: Can’t wait. Have you had the time to get to that tax movie I sent you?
Sincerely,
-Dave

4/04/2007

5/14/2007  
Blogger The Squamata Report said...

When the subject of 'GLOBAL' Warming is discussed you generally include countries other than America. The relevance is that we are adopting foreign law every day in this country. People like John Paul Stevens goes to France, Russia, Germany and Italy to support his decisions. Local and State legislatures are increasingly referring to foreign law in precedence setting cases. So my pointing to Belgium as an example of how crazy this attempt to guilt people into changing their entire governmental and social structure is as you said, fascist!
Oh, and by the way. What is C02? We exhale C02! When I referred to children being regulated by the government under C02 restrictions I am pointing to the admittedly absurd but real chance they will say our population size is contributing to Global Warming. Population control is not really something you want to support is it buddy?

Besides, C02 is a good thing. No proof was ever given that C02 even depletes the ever shifting layer of ozone. Mt. Pinatubo released more C02 into the atmosphere in 1991 than man has ever produced.It's plume of sulfur dioxide and C02 shot 21 miles above the Earth and tropical storm Yunya helped the particles to travel 250 miles away. The ash covered 772 square miles and it is not the worst nor the first volcanic eruption. Is God so incompetent that he created a system within the Earth that would destroy it? Come on man you are smarter than this. These people are out to use a scare tactic and guilt trip us into giving up our liberty and freedom. If you cannot open your eyes enough to consider the possibility that the totally insane Al Gore and his paid whores masquerading as scientists may be leading you astray, you are totally 'Brain and Mind-washed'.

Do you realize that people reported more than three thousand years ago (half Earth's lifetime) that the increase in warming caused the fish to be more plentiful. They said the warming trends made the vegetation greener and healthier. The same thing happened at the turn of the 20th Century. Check records, I have.
The forecasted warming trend is less than a full degree in the next century. Yet some of the same and I mean SAME scientists who said in 1978 that Global cooling would push us in to the next ice age are now saying Global Warming will cook us all.
The reason for their fright was because by their best guess the global climate had cooled. And indeed it had. It was coming off a warming trend that saw global temps reach two degrees higher than the then current temp. So they assumed the trend would continue. The difference is that the Democrats and Leftists have joined with the Greenies to form the enviro-nazis we know today. They have great backing and the benefit of Mainstream media to propagate their agenda.

4/04/2007

5/14/2007  
Blogger The Squamata Report said...

Dave after you read the piece about the BBQ tax, ask yourself, which emits more of the dreaded Co2 (a natural substance used in sustaining and improving life) the few frightened overtaxed citizens (most are poor by Western standards) or the hundreds of hours of monitoring by helicopter? I guess they will need the extra tax money to pay the pilots who spy on the public non stop!
Is there any tax you don't love at first sight?
Seriously, do you ever think we are over taxed? And just how is the totally non corrupt government going to use these extra funds to stave off GW?
The consensus, even among Gore's Whores, is that nothing can be done to deter or lessen the current warming trend. Nothing can be done to repair the Ozone holes and nothing can reduce Co2 output because all life and some inanimate objects like volcanoes continuously create it.

Should we not throw our trash out the car window? Yes. Should we recycle to reduce the manufacturing costs and cut back on clutter? You bet. Should we replant trees at a rate higher than we harvest them? Of course!
Should we point the finger at our selves for destroying a planet we can't even effect enough change in to save if it needed
saving? Should we adopt a treaty that is not required for most of the top (so-called) polluting nations? China and India emit more Co2 than America We just emit more per capita because we don't have fifty people cramped into every square foot of our country! Yet they are exempt! I'd say the answer is a big no!

Can you defend the practice of carbon offsets? I don't think you can honestly support rich millionaires like Gore who travel in big jets all around the world own vast mansions and produce a larger Carbon footprint than 60% of American people, buying so called credits from someone who produces less just so they can continue to live their hypocritical lives. You don't support that do you?

4/04/2007

5/14/2007  
Anonymous Mountain Mama said...

Very interesting post. I tried real hard not to laugh Ken, but it didn't work. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
It seems your misguided reader is still doing what he does best.
Interesting that he uses grade school slang to express himself, isn't it. It must make you feel like you are trying to explain algebra to a kindergarten boy.

4/09/2007

5/14/2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home

 

LIVE AMBER ALERTS